Charter change guarantees no economic takeoff—experts

By Likha C. Cuevas
Published on Page B2 of the July 17, 2006 issue of the Manila Times

A PROPOSAL to relax constitutional limits on ownership of land and select industries is no “sure-fire” way to increase foreign direct investments, according to experts.

“Changing the Constitution, liberalizing—or removing those [protectionist] provisions of the Constitution, as I’ve said before, is like somebody with a diarrhea and said the diarrhea will be fixed by changing toilet seat,” Solita C. Monsod, a former socioeconomic planning secretary, told participants of a forum organized by the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

While data show an association between foreign investment and higher levels of income, these however “do not establish whether foreign investments cause higher income levels or higher income levels cause the foreign investment,” Monsod, an economics professor at the University of the Philippines, said.

In proving her point, the former Aquino Cabinet official cited expert opinion on China, whose economic growth came ahead of the inflow of foreign investments.

On the micro or project level, a majority of projects yielded positive effects on national income but one-third of studies show that “anywhere from 25 to 45 percent have deleterious effects. That means more FDI does not necessarily mean better [for the host country],” Monsod said.

She said studies show that FDI are small relative to total investments in the Asia-Pacific region with the exception of China and Singapore.

In the same forum, former senator Wigberto Tañada, lead convener of the nongovernment Fair Trade Alliance (FTA), said that the Philippines is already liberalized and open to foreign investments and legislation already provided for the entry of foreign investments in many local industries.

He also said that it was during the protectionist and nationalist period of the 1950s and 1960s that the country “experienced accelerated industrial growth” making the Philippines Asia’s fastest-growing economy second only to Japan.

Therefore, opening up the few remaining restricted resources and sectors in the country will not address poverty, he added.

Instead of altering the Constitution, he said the government should concentrate on addressing the factors that turn off investors, including corruption, bad infrastructure and political instability.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • FairTrade in pictures

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Founded in 2001, the Fair Trade Alliance (FairTrade) of the Philippines is a broad multisectoral coalition of formal and informal labor, industry, agriculture, NGOs and youth pushing for trade and economic reforms.
  • FairTrade seeks to promote a job-full and progressive Philippine economy through: (1) the promotion of fair trade rules and active agro-industrial policies based on the existing development needs of the nation, (2) the development of a positive agro-industrial culture to foster innovation, hard work and solidarity between and among the productive sectors of Philippine society, and (3) the transformation of an economy debased and stunted by colonial mentality, unequal trade and neo-liberal dogma into a modern, sustainable and broad-based.
  • Fair Trade Alliance (FairTrade)
    3/f Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM) Headquarters
    #56 Mo. Ignacia cor. Dr. Lascano, Quezon City, The Philippines
    (+632) 372 49 91 to 92 local 30
    (+632) 372 39 24

    FairTradeWeb is powered by Wordpress, MediaMax, MediaFire, Yahoo!, FeedBurner and Flickr.

  • Subscribe in Bloglines

%d bloggers like this: